Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing - a reply to Joona Räsänen

Rodger, Daniel (2017) Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing - a reply to Joona Räsänen. Bioethics. (In Press)

Abstract

More Information

Keywords: infanticide, persons, substance view, after-birth abortion, abortion
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Rodger, D, Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing - a reply to Joona Räsänen, Bioethics. The article will be published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8519 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Divisions: Schools > Health and Social Care > Allied Health Sciences
Date Deposited: 13 Dec 2017 11:32
Creators:
CreatorsORCID
Rodger, Daniel
Item Type: Article
Creators: Rodger, Daniel
Depositing User: LSBU Open Access Team
Last Modified: 24 Jan 2018 15:15
Item ID: 1661

Download

Text
Response to Räsänen - Bioethics (1).pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 January 2020.
Licence: Logo for Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial license

Download (142kB)

Export Citation

Share

Statistics

IRStats2

Downloads
Activity Overview
1Download
88Hits

Statistics for this record are available via IRStats2