Orthopaedic nurses' engagement in clinical research; an exploration of ideas, facilitators and challenges.

Journal article

Bench S, Dowie-Baker JA and Fish P (2019). Orthopaedic nurses' engagement in clinical research; an exploration of ideas, facilitators and challenges. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. 35, p. 100699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2019.04.002
AuthorsBench S, Dowie-Baker JA and Fish P
Abstract

Background: Previous international studies have identified individual and organisational barriers to nurses’ research utilisation, but there is little data reporting on nurses’ engagement in research design and/or delivery, particularly within the orthopaedic speciality.
Aim: To explore orthopaedic nurses’ views regarding the research priorities for neuro-musculoskeletal care and the perceived barriers and facilitators associated with their engagement in the research process.
Methods: A single centre mixed methods study (n=75) collected data via a survey and 14 focus group discussions.
Findings: Our sample of clinical orthopaedic nurses showed little evidence of research engagement. Research priorities focused on 1. Understanding and improving patient and staff experiences 2. Improving processes, systems and workload models 3. Interventions to improve clinical outcomes. Key themes arising from the focus group discussion data were research activity, priorities and motivation, culture and leadership, and resources.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that there is still significant work to do build sufficient research capacity and capability within the nursing workforce. Key to success will be developing effective leaders, who can create a positive and supportive research culture across an organisation to strengthen the research voice of nursing, which will drive improvements in future care.

Keywordsorthopaedic nursing; nursing research; clinical-academic; leadership; barriers; facilitators
Year2019
JournalInternational Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing
Journal citation35, p. 100699
PublisherElsevier
ISSN1878-1241
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2019.04.002
Web address (URL)http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/31542307
Publication dates
Print03 May 2019
May 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited11 May 2019
Accepted15 Apr 2019
File
License
File Access Level
Open
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/866v3

Download files

  • 229
    total views
  • 345
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 6
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Implementing a discharge process for patients undergoing elective surgery: Rapid review
Bench, S., Cardoso Teixeira, M., Khouri, M. and Martinez, E. (2023). Implementing a discharge process for patients undergoing elective surgery: Rapid review. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. 48, p. 101001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101001
Non-pharmacological interventions for self-management of fatigue in adults: an umbrella review of potential interventions to support patients recovering from critical illness
Brown, S.E., Shah, A., Czuber-Dochan, W., Bench, S. and Stayt, L. (2023). Non-pharmacological interventions for self-management of fatigue in adults: an umbrella review of potential interventions to support patients recovering from critical illness . Journal of Critical Care. 75, p. 154279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154279
Overcoming the challenges of recruiting and interviewing research participants following critical illness due to Covid-19.
James, A., Thomas, N. and Bench, S. (2023). Overcoming the challenges of recruiting and interviewing research participants following critical illness due to Covid-19. Nurse Researcher. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2023.e1854
Nurses' perceptions of point of care testing in critical care: A cross‐sectional survey
Bench, S. and Lennox, S. (2022). Nurses' perceptions of point of care testing in critical care: A cross‐sectional survey. Nursing in Critical Care. 29 (1), pp. 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12869
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) at the preanalytical phase for POCT blood gas analysis: proposal for a shared proactive risk analysis model.
Van Hoof V, Bench S, Soto AB, Luppa PP, Malpass A, Schilling UM, Rooney KD, Stretton A and Tintu AN (2022). Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) at the preanalytical phase for POCT blood gas analysis: proposal for a shared proactive risk analysis model. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. 60 (8). https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0319
Learning from COVID-19: Cross-sectional e-survey of critical care nurses' satisfaction and experiences of their role in the pandemic response across the United Kingdom.
Stayt LC, Bench S, Credland N and Plowright C (2022). Learning from COVID-19: Cross-sectional e-survey of critical care nurses' satisfaction and experiences of their role in the pandemic response across the United Kingdom. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12850
Prevalence of skin pressure injury in critical care patients in the UK: results of a single-day point prevalence evaluation in adult critically ill patients.
Rubulotta F, Brett S, Boulanger C, Blackwood B, Deschepper M, Labeau SO, Blot S, UK Collaborating Site Investigators, DecubICUs study team and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Trials’ Group UK Collaborators and Bench, S. (2022). Prevalence of skin pressure injury in critical care patients in the UK: results of a single-day point prevalence evaluation in adult critically ill patients. BMJ Open. 12 (11), p. e057010. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057010
Patients’ perspectives of recovery after COVID-19 critical illness; an interview study
Bench, S., Cherry, H., Hodson, M., James, A., McGuinness, N., Parker, G. and Thomas, N. (2022). Patients’ perspectives of recovery after COVID-19 critical illness; an interview study. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12867
Research behind a webcam: an exploration of virtual interviewing with children and young people.
Bichard, E., McKeever, S., Wray, J. and Bench, S. (2022). Research behind a webcam: an exploration of virtual interviewing with children and young people. Nurse Researcher. 30 (4), pp. 39-46. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1857
‘Doing the best we can’: Registered Nurses' experiences and perceptions of patient safety in intensive care during COVID-19
Stayt, L.C., Merriman, C., Bench, S., Price, A.M., Vollam, S., Walthall, H., Credland, N., Gerber, K. and Calovski, V. (2022). ‘Doing the best we can’: Registered Nurses' experiences and perceptions of patient safety in intensive care during COVID-19. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 78 (10), pp. 3371-3384. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15419
Recovery, rehabilitation and follow-up services following critical illness: an updated UK national cross-sectional survey and progress report.
Connolly B, Milton-Cole R, Adams C, Battle C, McPeake J, Quasim T, Silversides J, Slack A, Waldmann C, Wilson E, Meyer J, Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine Life After Critical Illness Working Group and Bench, S. (2021). Recovery, rehabilitation and follow-up services following critical illness: an updated UK national cross-sectional survey and progress report. BMJ Open. 11, p. e052214. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052214
Education provision for patients following a spinal cord injury
Rodger, S and Bench, S. (2019). Education provision for patients following a spinal cord injury. British Journal of Nursing. 28 (6), pp. 377-381. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.6.377
A rapid review of educational preparedness of advanced clinical practitioners.
Dover N, Lee GA, Raleigh M, Baker EJ, Starodub R, Bench S and Garry B (2019). A rapid review of educational preparedness of advanced clinical practitioners. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14105
Use of a Virtual Reality device for basic life support training; prototype testing and an exploration of users' views and experience
Bench, S., Winter, C. and Francis, G (2019). Use of a Virtual Reality device for basic life support training; prototype testing and an exploration of users' views and experience. Simulation in Healthcare. 14 (5), pp. 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000387